<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The drivel and gush of the television serial	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://my1960s.com/shulman/the-drivel-and-gush-of-the-television-serial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://my1960s.com/shulman/the-drivel-and-gush-of-the-television-serial/</link>
	<description>We grew up in the sixties and loved every minute of it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul Wheeler		</title>
		<link>https://my1960s.com/shulman/the-drivel-and-gush-of-the-television-serial/#comment-70</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Wheeler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my1960s.com/?p=2643#comment-70</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did Milton Shulman ever like anything?

Although he seemed to spend his whole life criticising the efforts of others, I suppose he had cottoned on early to the idea that to make a living as a tv reviewer he had to be totally scathing in his critiques.

&#039;Not too bad&#039; or &#039;Okay&#039; wouldn&#039;t sell papers and get him a commission, so arguably he was the one dumbing down, by going straight for the cheap insults every time. I can remember &#039;proper&#039; tv reviewers like Richard Last of The Daily Telegraph, who I&#039;m sure would have considered Shulman to be the &#039;Crossroads of tv reviewers&#039; (very much at the low end of the market).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Milton Shulman ever like anything?</p>
<p>Although he seemed to spend his whole life criticising the efforts of others, I suppose he had cottoned on early to the idea that to make a living as a tv reviewer he had to be totally scathing in his critiques.</p>
<p>&#8216;Not too bad&#8217; or &#8216;Okay&#8217; wouldn&#8217;t sell papers and get him a commission, so arguably he was the one dumbing down, by going straight for the cheap insults every time. I can remember &#8216;proper&#8217; tv reviewers like Richard Last of The Daily Telegraph, who I&#8217;m sure would have considered Shulman to be the &#8216;Crossroads of tv reviewers&#8217; (very much at the low end of the market).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
